video wala gana

Capacitive touch screen and resistive touch screen are mainly different in touch sensitivity, precision, cost, multi touch feasibility, anti-damage, cleaning and visual effect in sunlight.   Touch Sensitivity Resistive touch screen: it needs pressure to make all layers of the screen contact. It can be operated with fingers (even with gloves), nails, stylus, etc. Support for stylus is very important in Asian market, gesture and character recognition are valued everywhere. Capacitive touch screen: the slightest touch from the surface of a charged finger can also activate the capacitive sensing system below the screen. Non-living objects, nails and gloves are invalid. Handwriting recognition is difficult.   Accuracy Resistive touch screen: the accuracy is at least a single display pixel, which can be seen when using the stylus. It is easy to recognize handwriting and is helpful to operate in the interface using small control elements. Capacitive touch screen: the theoretical accuracy can reach several pixels, but it is actually limited by the finger contact area. So that it is difficult for users to accurately click the target less than 1cm2.   Cost Resistive touch screen: very cheap. Capacitive touch screen: the price of capacitive screen from different manufacturers is 10% to 50% higher than that of resistive screen. This extra cost doesn’t matter for flagship products, but it may deter mid-priced phones.   The feasibility of multi touch Resistive touch screen: not possible unless the resistive screen is reconstituted and connected to the circuit of the machine. Capacitive touch screen: depending

What is the reason why mainstream DLP seamless splicing screen companies have spared no effort to invest in cross-border? Looking at the development of the entire large-screen splicing industry, the cross-border layout is a choice that relevant companies have to make. The only difference lies in where the company will focus its efforts. In the past large-screen splicing field, DLP seamless splicing large-screen large screens are the well-deserved leader. Moreover, due to the high technical threshold of the industry and the limited number of enterprises engaged, it has been able to maintain a high profit margin. With the high-end development of LCD splicing and the rise of small-pitch LED screens, DLP seamless splicing screens are no longer unique from the application market level, and are squeezed due to inherent technical defects. Subsequently, in order to maintain the established operating profit, although DLP seamless splicing screen companies actively involved in liquid crystal display and small pitch, they have lost their original monopoly advantage. Obviously, this development model is not the traditional DLP without Sewing splicing screen companies want. In the face of a rapidly changing market, if DLP seamless splicing screen companies want to maintain their leading business model, break the inherent business circle, and find a new point of force, it has become the most effective means. From a long-term development perspective, from a single operation to a diversified operation, the corporate interests of DLP seamless splicing screens will be more guaranteed, but for the DLP seamless splicing screen industry